Rogerian Argument Outline

I. paragraph One Introduction Topic/issue external handling by the international committee and institution powers like the United States into the national affairs of warring nations is essential for house servant conflict resolution. Opposing vox populi Warring nations should be responsible for their own domestic conflicts and find ways to resolve them. Others nations should limit their discussion to just the mediation of peace talks. Writers viewExternal military and diplomatic interjection has been the key to solving major civil conflicts and preventing possible genocides in countries such as sierra Leone and Libya darn people in countries such as Rwanda and currently in Syria endure the worst because of the blind sum or unwillingness to react to atrocities against humanity by the international community. Problem Key terms preventative atrocities genocide mediation II. Paragraph Two Summary of the Opposing Views Positionbriny window pane A Each nation must be self-responsib le for their domestic conflict and find ways to resolve it. primary(prenominal) point B The cost incurred in the form of lost military lives and equipment on the intervening nations is loosely too much. The cost of funding these wars can easily get out of hands as conflicts campaign to last longer than mostly anticipated. Main point C III. Paragraph Three Statement of cogency (Why their view must be valid, IV.Paragraph Four Summary of the Writers Position Main point A Innocent civilians in Nations such as Liberia and Sierra Leone endured decades of war. Only after massive intervention by the international committee were these conflicts resolved. The same can be said for Libya and currently in DR. Congo. Main point B However, the same cannot be said for countries such Rwanda or Bosnia where modern genocide occurred to a lower place the watch of the international committee. Main point CDespite all the daily reports and evidence approach from Syria, the international community is still undecided on which course of action to take to alleviate the incommode and suffering of the innocent civilians. V. Paragraph Five Statement of Validity Context or specific circumstance(s) in which this view may be considered valid even though it is best to allow domestic conflicts to be self-resolved it is also in the interest of humanity that the international committee and nations such as the United States periodically intervene in conflicts that gets out of hand.VI. Paragraph Six Statement of Benefit(s) Even though it is right that domestic conflicts are best solved nationally, it is in the interest of the innocent and oppressed that the international committee intervenes to go through these solutions. VII. Paragraph Seven Conclusion Summary The international committee should intervene in escalating domestic conflicts to admirer in resolving. Common ground Compromise Proposed solution Positive, hopeful statement (Relate to how SL. Spent yrs negotiating till intervention. )